​

      Mainstream media and almost every left-leaning newspaper and social media platform have been complicit, along with most politicians and chief medical officers, in spreading lies and panic about the COVID-19 "pandemic" that not even their own mortality figures can justify, let alone the unprecedented amount of wanton destruction lockdowns have imposed on the Australian economy and the health and wellbeing of the Australian people. In terms of magnitude the mortality rate of COVID-19 was and is way below the mortality rate for other diseases and in Australia is not even in the top twenty. As Peter Smith points out in the 2021 November edition of Quadrant Magazine, entitled Sting, Where Are Thy Deaths?

 

In fact, the ABS reports that deaths in 2020 at 161,300 were fewer than in 2019 at 169,301. The 20 leading causes are listed. COVID didn’t make the cut, but was given special mention as the 38th. It reportedly caused 898 deaths with a median age of 86.9 years compared with 81.7 years for deaths as a whole. Sad though most deaths are for families and friends, how can those dying in their mid-eighties be described by the Prime Minister as each a “terrible tragedy,” without losing all sensible perspective and running out of superlatives fit for purpose.

Let me mention the 3,144 women who died in 2020 of breast cancer, with a median age of 72 years. The 2,186 people who died of melanoma, with a median age of 64.7 years. The 16,587 who died of heart disease, with a median age of 84.7 years. The 3,139 who committed suicide, with a median age of only 43.5 years. Children also died in 2020; each properly described as a terrible tragedy. By the way, make of it what you will. Set against COVID deaths of 898, influenza -pneumonia deaths in 2020 were down 1,837 on their level in 2019 (admittedly a high year). But they were also down 815 on their level in 2018 (not a high year). Net-zero COVID/ Flu deaths perhaps?

 

The risk of dying from COVID is small, vanishingly small if you are neither old nor have serious underlying illnesses. That of course doesn’t fit the agenda. You can’t scare people witless and force novel so-called vaccines on them by telling the truth.

 

Nevertheless, discriminatory regulations have been drawn up by the Leftist controlled World Health Organization and adopted by the United Nations, as "international protocols" that legitimise mandatory vaccines, vaccine passports, unprecedented police and government powers, the loss of civil and constitutional liberties and medical and social discrimination against those who choose not to "get the jab."

This document outlines the WHO's favourable position on mandatory vaccination:

 

WHO-2019-nCoV-Policy-brief-Mandatory-vaccination-2021.1

And this one sanctions the use of vaccine passports:

WHO-2019-nCoV-Digital_certificates-vaccination-2021.1

 

The implementation of these anti-democratic protocols has contributed to the worse kind of medical apartheid since the Nazis came to power in Germany, and the Marxists in Russia, both of whom incorporated - as the Andrews government incorporates in Victoria today - medical apartheid as a weapon of coercion and control.

 

During the Nazi regime, German doctors frequently published papers how Jews spread disease. Reflecting common themes in Nazi propaganda, these medical professionals repeatedly pushed the false claim that Jews were especially responsible for outbreaks of typhus—a deadly contagious disease, which again is synonymous in more ways than one with the type of propaganda disseminated by the Andrews government, the mainstream media, the World Health Organization and the United Nations, who are of the shared opinion that the unvaccinated are primarily "responsible for the spread", and should be isolated from the rest of the community, against whom draconian measures need to be implemented, including the destruction of their civil rights and ability to earn a living.

In the Soviet Union apartheid laws were used against those who were critical of the regime. Much of this abuse was instituted by Marxist apparatchiks and carried out by medical authorities in hospitals and psychiatric facilities and was entitled "psychopathology." Anyone who didn't go along with Bolshevik propaganda were considered "psychopathological" and said to be suffering from a mental disease, and needed to be separated from society for "health reasons." In 1967 Article 190-1 "Dissemination of fabrications known to be false, which defame the Soviet political and social system", was added to the RSFSR Criminal Code. These laws were frequently applied in conjunction with the system of diagnosis for mental illness (Fulford, K.; Smirnov, A.; Snow, E. Concepts of disease and the abuse of psychiatry in the USSR. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1993).

At the conclusion of the Second World War, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed against humanity. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal, raised the question and meaning of "ethical principles" when it came to the practice of forced and mandatory medical procedures. Because the consequences of such actions were so abhorrent, the world decided that an inviolable code be set down as insurance, to protect future generations from the lunatic schemes of tyrants and sociopaths that totalitarian ideologies and corrupt political systems, at times, seem to breed like rats. An examination of each of the ten Nuremberg Codes ( cited below ) clearly illustrates that the medical apartheid regimes employed by the Nazis and the Marxists, and in most Western nations today - contravene  several of these codes, the first for example is: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential."

One of the major players in the development of America's Confederate (pro-slavery) States was the medical apartheid system for the ongoing justification of human slavery declaring that "Northern doctors were totally ignorant of a special variety of diseases that afflicted only Negroes," and that "the state's doctors laboured to defend the Southern contention that Negro slavery was morally right." (James Denny Guillory, The Pro-Slavery arguments of Dr Samuel A. Cartwright. Louisiana Historical Association. Vol 9. No3 pp.209-210, 1968). In an article that appeared in The Spectator (2021/06) entitled The Looming Medical Apartheid Created by the Myths and Fearmongering surrounding the so-called COVID-19 Pandemic, a Dean at Brandis University compared the current Leftist push for mandatory vaccination "to pre-Civil Rights era denial of human rights for the black population" and that "those who loved freedom must act before it's too late."

The South African apartheid system was also one that popularised the idea of racial apartheid, much to the revulsion of the Western world and decent people everywhere. Baasskap ("boss-ship" or "boss-hood") was later known as a form of white supremacy. After the system of Baasskap was overthrown, the African National Congress (ANC) imposed a reverse apartheid system. One of the most graphic exposés of reverse apartheid in South Africa is Lauren Southern's award-winning documentary Farmlands which looks at life in South Africa today for its white minority, many of whom live in squatter camps where poverty-stricken families are denied basic human rights and services. Lauren interviews white victims and those -black and white- who want to end this reverse cycle of apartheid and the racist ANC's Marxist mania for blaming the sins of the past on the present (https://widerimage.reuters.com/story/white-poverty-insouth-Africa).

Soviet-era dissident, Igor Shafarevich, once said that "inside every anarchist, there is a raging totalitarian waiting to be loosened on the world." His words certainly have a ring of truth to them today, when, for example, principle figures on the Left like the "humanitarian" anarchist Noam Chomsky, now not only advocate for medical apartheid but think detention centres (Gulags) are warranted and believe it a good idea to starve people into submission, a Holodomor 2.0! (informationliberation.com/Oct.25,2021) 

I have always suspected that many people like Chomsky, below their virtue signalling façades, are Deep State operatives. With Chomsky that certainly seems to be the case  (https://libcom.org/history/john-deutch-chomskys-friend-pentagon-cia).

 

There are other prominent Leftist intellectuals, who like Chomsky, have had a recent fascist epiphany. Most readers would be familiar with the name Peter Singer - a Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University - one of the world's leading voices of the Animal Liberation Movement. Singer believes that even the use of animals in laboratory experimentation needs to be given strict ethical consideration, with no doubt remaining before their use is approved for experimentation.

But Professor Singer does not reflect the same concern for human beings and is content to remove all ethical and moral considerations when it comes to the use of an untested experimental vaccine on men, women and children. Singer was once famously described as the most dangerous man in the world because of his views on abortion, disability and animal rights. Now the "ethical philosopher" is arguing for mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 with all its accompanying injustices! (Patricia Karvelas on RN Drive Wed 25 Aug 2021, 7:06 pm www.abc.net.au/). 

 

Singer also believes mandatory vaccination is based on the same ethical argument as mandatory seatbelts. This argument is used by many neo-apartheidists today as justification for imposing a tyrannical regime on the people. But to compare mandatory seatbelt-wearing to mandatory experimental vaccination on a human population is a deeply flawed analogy for several reasons.

Whilst the efficacy of seat belts has been rigorously tested and standardized, the vaccines for COVID-19 have not. The statistics for the vaccine damaged and dead from across the Western World alone illustrate that the collateral damage is alarmingly higher than for vaccines that have been rigorously tested for short and long-term side effects. You only have to install a seatbelt once, but with these untested vaccines, people are told they need a booster shot every few months.

There are several companies in Australia that manufacture seatbelts. If you are in an accident and the belt fails to work as advertised, you can sue the company for damages. On the other hand, the "experimental" vaccines have not undergone full testing procedures, but if you take them, and are seriously injured or die, you and your family just have to cop it sweet, because the corporations and governments who mandate (forced) them on you are not accountable.

Further, You can still get COVID-19 if you are vaccinated, and it is most likely the vaccinated who are "shedding" the virus and creating new variants as the recent surges in South Africa, Israel and Australia seem to indicate (sciencebasedmedicine.org. August 16, 2021). In Australia, on July 2021, Daniel Andrews locked down the state of Victoria, at the time mass vaccinations were being imposed. There were less than 20 cases. Twelve weeks later when he reopened the state there were almost 26,000! The result of this lockdown had a catastrophic impact on the Victorian economy, with tens of thousands of people losing their jobs and businesses, and many thousands more unable to pay their rent or mortgages, and in many cases were struggling to put food on the table - an enormous price to pay. The surge of the "Delta variant" in Israel followed a similar pattern in 2021 after the majority of the population had been fully vaccinated. In Israel today the majority of the population has had not one but two booster shots after which the Omicron variant began to surge! (republicworld.com. 10 January 2022).
 

There have been 100s cases in Victoria and NSW where the vaccinated infecting the vaccinated has occurred. One example was a NSW Gym where recently 15 fully vaccinated people tested positive, infecting other patrons, who were also fully vaccinated. "Owner Billy Kokkinis says they have been meticulously following COVID safe practices," which obviously included excluding the unvaccinated from the gym. "You can't tell me one day that we're the cleanest gym and then the next day tell me we're a hotspot," he said. The only possible explanation for this is that the vaccinated have been infecting the vaccinated (Sky News October 28, 2021).
 

The question needs to be asked: if people can still contract the virus from those who are fully vaccinated as easily as they can contract it from the unvaccinated, then how in scientific terms are the unvaccinated a threat to them? None of this makes any scientific sense. 

 

Did businesses ever deny entry to those who failed to install a seatbelt in their car? Were people forced to produce a passport to prove they had seatbelts installed? Did the police kick in their front doors for a thought crime? Indiscriminately shoot rubber bullets and tear gas at them and their children at demonstrations?

​

But I suppose, when anti-lockdown protestors are considered the spearhead of a "racist, neo-fascist Nazi movement" by the idiot Establishment Left, every kind of violence against them can be justified.
 

Right now the far-right is growing across Australia. The right-wing anti-lockdown, anti-vaccine movements have provided ground for fascists to seed, and CARF has launched the campaign ‘Pro-Vax, Pro-Union, Anti-Fascist’ to combat this (https://www.carf.melbourne/).

 

The only people creating a far-right, fascist, neo-Nazi, anti-vax movement in Australia are the mainstream media and the  "in bed together " Establishment bastions of the Left and Right, who have approved every draconian move Andrews and other Australian Premiers have employed against the Australian people...which include shooting rubber bullets at men, women and children; banning the right to demonstrate, locking people in their homes, restricting travel, invading people's homes and arresting them for Facebook posts (including a pregnant mother); beating a 75-year-old grandmother to the ground then pepper spraying her; forcibly arresting Aboriginal Australians (including a Clan leader)  whilst members of the armed forces held him down and inject him with an experimental concoction of a synthetic vaccine, against his will.  Meanwhile, Australian "workers" in their millions (whom CARF supposedly represent ) lose their jobs and their homes.  These developments are what CARF and the fuckwits who support them stand for.

 

And let's not forget how their complicity continues to sanction some of the biggest, most corrupt multinational corporations in the world in order to enforce their Marxist - by every definition of the word - Fascist agenda on the people, including Big Pharma. What a bunch of hypocrites they are! What liars!

As anyone who has attended these anti-lockdown protests can bear witness - including myself! When I attended one recently, I saw Anglo-Saxons, black Africans, Indians, Aboriginals,  Pakistanis, Chinese, Jewish, Arabic and others including members of several religious organizations standing together in solidarity as Australians. And let's not forget that these Leftist braindead Establishment hacks have no interest in Australian workers. Their goal is to destroy Australia, impose a dictatorship, and are using a violent system of medical apartheid to do so! 

These Marxists and their right-wing running dogs are the real fascists! Not the "multi-cultures" of Australian citizens, whose main concern is that their freedom, their livelihoods and human rights are being violated and destroyed; that they no longer even have agency over their own bodies,  or the freedom to choose.  And to rebel against this kind of oppression, according to the Left, is indicative of a fascist/Nazi racist agenda! Quelle bande d’idiots!

 

                                                                              NUREMBERG  CODE

 

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made, and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

 

 

Although not mentioned above, it is also reasonable to state that the introduction of or threat to introduce vaccine passports, as well as the threat to not lift lockdowns, masking regulations, restaurant occupancy and so on, unless and until a certain percentage of the population has been vaccinated (I do not mean “immunized”), are examples of malicious coercion!

 

Relating to the 10 points of the Nuremberg Regulations for Human Research, it is clear that this vaccine trial is continuing on an illegal basis.


© 2021 Eugene Alexander Donnini.

​

 

16/2/2022:

 

Australian Bureau of Statistics

​

The statistics, released by the ABS on Tuesday, showed there were underlying health issues involved in 92 per cent of the 2639 deaths attributed to Covid-19 between March 2020 and January 31 this year. The underlying conditions ranged from pneumonia and kidney infection to chronic heart illnesses. During the same period, 100,000 Australians died from cancer, 32,000 from heart disease, 30,000 from Alzheimer and dementia, and 10,000 from diabetes. The Covid-19 deaths, meanwhile, made up only one per cent of all fatalities nationwide.  [ AS REPORTED BY RADIO 2GB AND NEWS.COM.AUST ]
 

​

​

​

​

 

 

 

 

​







 

​